Fringe - "Of Human Action" (2.07)

Now this is what Jasika was talking about. This episode is so much better than last week's episode, most notably because it is a very mythological episode, which makes me happy because I didn't think that it was going to be based on the promo that we saw at the end of “Earthling” last week. Not only did it look like it was going to be a “stand-alone” episode, but it looked like an idea that has been toyed with repeatedly in sci-fi, and even though the latter remains true, as Fringe does sometimes, it took an idea that has already been used before and made it its own. Mind control is definitely not a new concept that Fringe invented, but I'm pretty sure that its explanation is, and even though I am not sure if it has any validity to it (I'm sure that I will find out during The Fringe Podcast, most specifically during its Science of Tomorrow section), it is still pretty cool. This entry will contain spoilers that pertain to this specific episode of the series as well as the series in general, so please don't read any further if you don't want to be spoiled.
 
The first observation that I would like to make is that earlier this week, I saw a promo photo in which Peter and Walter are standing at a Massive Dynamic window, and this, of course, ended up being the scene in which Walter has a discussion with Peter in which he voices his obvious jealousy regarding William Bell. He reminds Peter that he and Bell used to be lab partners and then says to pay mind to how much Bell has accomplished, obviously in comparison to how much Walter has accomplished. This is one of many scenes that have taken place during the course of this series thus far in which I have felt sorry for Walter. I think that it's quite obvious that he was thinking about his seventeen years having been institutionalized while William Bell has been chairman of Massive Dynamic (which obviously vehemently fascinates him, such as his exclamation which questioned the validity of them having seventy-three labs, a confirmation that astonishes him). He feels as if a good portion of his life has been taken away from him.
 
My point, however, is that I recall some people speculating as to whether or not that was actually the interior of the Twin Towers, since, admittedly, it does look quite similar, especially since the photo was a bit orange-tinted. We know from our time spent on the Other Side, both at the very end of the first season when we first meet William Bell and also in episode 2.04, “Momentum Deferred,” that the color scheme seems to be a bit different. I'm not sure why or if perhaps that is just because the scene takes place when the sun appears to be rising, but, anyway, I had a pretty good feeling that it was not the Twin Towers but instead Massive Dynamic, and I was right. I could have sworn that Walter has seen Massive Dynamic before, but then, when I got thinking about it, I couldn't think of an example, so I quickly came to the conclusion that he had, in fact, not and that that is why it fascinates him so much.

This episode successfully makes it quite clear that Walter cares deeply for Peter and that he loves him very much. There are a few scenes that clearly exemplify this, starting with the scene in which Walter first realizes that Peter is missing, and he looks like he is going to cry while he pleads with Olivia to help him look for him. Then, there is the scene in which he and Olivia are talking while Olivia urges him to try to think of a way to reverse Tyler's ability. Walter says to her, again appearing to be on the verge of tears, “I can't lose him again. Peter always helps me. I don't know what to do. How do I do this without Peter? He always helps me.” Of course, pertaining to something that I will discuss later, Nina, oddly enough, seems genuinely concerned for Walter here, and even though I have no idea what to make of it, I find it odd how Walter suddenly has an epiphany regarding the EMF scrambler when she comforts him.
 
There is also the scene during which Walter experiences a breakdown in front of Dr. Carson. In fact, it is because of Dr. Carson. He explains to Dr. Carson what most likely caused Tyler's “ability,” and Walter lectures him, saying that “because of this man's inability to be a proper parent, his son has kidnapped mine.” In a way, this scene is a bit funny because Walter really isn't one to talk about being a proper parent, but at the same time, it isn't funny at all because it is yet another example of how much Walter cares for and loves Peter. Additionally, Walter is right; leaving pharmaceuticals like that lying around the house for a teenage boy to find is not an action that a “proper parent” would take, and, of course, as we now know, that is because it was no accident. Anyway, as I have already said, Jasika was definitely right about this episode in saying that it was an excellent episode, but she also said that between “Earthling,” “Of Human Action” and “August,” we would see more of a connection between Walter and Astrid, and so far, I don't really think that we have. Perhaps next week, we will. She even said that Astrid's character would have some time outside of the lab and out in the field, but, once again, that is not something that we have seen yet. I am really looking forward to next week's episode, though, for multiple reasons, and these promises are amongst them.

Something that I do not understand about this episode is the teddybear. A very poor job of explaining
why the teddybear simulated an “in-utero” sound was done and also how exactly this prevented Tyler from being able to control minds. Of course, as Tyler tells Peter, it doesn't work, but Walter thought that it did. The scene in which Walter presents the teddybear to Peter and Astrid does contain a really good line, however, with which this episode is littered. Peter says to Walter, “A teddybear verses mind control spies. Bad guys don't stand a chance.” The look on Walter's face after Peter says this is really quite funny because, first of all, it has that air of discontent to it that reminds me of that scene during a first season episode in which Walter says to Peter, “Must you be so simple-minded?” Also, I think that, to some extent, Walter is a bit hurt because here he is showing Peter and Astrid something that he finds to be very exciting, something that he probably hopes Peter will, too, and then Peter shoots it down.

Yet another great line that this episode has to offer is when Walter asks Peter, “Do you think the FBI will ever give me a gun?” I think that it's pretty safe to assume that the answer to that would be a resounding “no,” but who knows? Maybe that line was used as foreshadowing.
Yet another Walterism that left me scratching my head in this episode is the scene in which Walter and Astrid are wearing aluminum caps on their heads, and when Olivia asks them why, Walter says, “I don't trust them here. I think they're trying to read my thoughts,” and then, Astrid says, “Massive Dynamic gives me the creeps, too,” but what doesn't make any sense is the lack of an answer to how it is exactly that aluminum caps are going to prevent that from happening. It is, of course, not important at all, but it is just something that made me wonder. I thought that it was funny how, in this scene, Walter explains to Olivia how he will go about interrupting Tyler's ability to control Peter's mind, and he says that Tyler “won't be able to think. He will become severely disoriented. He may even vomit.” He says that as if Tyler vomiting is an essential part of the equation, an important one, in fact, that will be vital to retrieving Peter. That's the type of thing that you would expect Walter to say.

The scene in which Peter is driving Walter's car at night with Tyler controlling him had a couple of aspects to it that I'd like to discuss. For starters, a motif that we have repeatedly seen on
Fringe is the colors red and green. A good example of this would be the lights that make people temporarily black-out in episode 1.08, “The Equation.” In this scene, we repeatedly see flashes of red and green on Peter's face, obviously from lights outside, and that's really all there is to that. At this point, it doesn't really have much of a significance except for the fact that it serves as a motif. Also, I thought that Peter's line (“Do you really think that you're the first kid whose father didn't think he was good enough or smart enough? Take a number.”) was very appropriate and perfectly matched because it is quite obvious what he had on his mind while he saying it, in that he isn't just talking about Tyler. Josh Jackson's acting, I would like to point out, is superb in this episode, especially at the scene when Tyler first takes control of him; the look on Peter's face is priceless, something that I don't think any other actor could have done better, and the dirt being spattered onto the camera as the car drives off is a nice touch, as well.

Peter's line near the end of the episode when Tyler is forcing him to shoot his mother's new lover is a bit cheesy and unnecessary, and I'm not quite sure why he says it. He says, “Tyler, what are you doing?” It is quite obvious what he is doing, and also, what I don't understand is that if Tyler wanted that man dead, then why doesn't Peter shoot him? Why is there seemingly such a gap in time between that scene and the scene in which Olivia and Broyles arrive? I mean, after all, he shoots Broyles without much hesitation, and it would seem to me that Broyles' offense would be much less whelming to Tyler than that of his mother's new lover (it is unclear as to whether they are married or just living together). When everything is all said and done, however, Walter seems so happy to finally have Peter back, and he tells him, “You always prove to be more resourceful than I give you credit for,” which is a dramatically ironic response to what Peter says to Tyler in the car, and despite Peter's sarcastic reply (“Was that supposed to be some sort of compliment?”), I really do think that it felt good for Peter to hear Walter say that.


During the second to final scene of the episode, Walter mentions Peter's mother for the second time during the episode, and that leads me to seriously wonder about Peter's mother. My theory is that Walter has done the same to Peter as Carson did to Tyler, in that he told him that Peter's mother is dead even though she really isn't. Walter tells Peter that when his mother used to make crêpes, Peter called them “creeps” and that this drove her “batty,” and I wonder if, although probably not due to Peter's mispronunciation of crêpes, she did in fact go “batty.” Perhaps she found out what Walter did (stealing alter-Peter from the other side), and this drove her crazy. I definitely think that she either is dead or that Walter has led Peter to believe that she is because Walter tells Peter that “she was a strong woman.” I do think that Peter is going to find out about what Walter did very soon, possibly even in the next episode, and I am very much dreading this because Walter and Peter are really starting to establish a strong relationship, and Peter is going to be beyond angry when he discovers the truth. I'm just wondering
how he's going to find out.

Just about the
only fault that I have with this episode is that I think it is a bit predictable in that I think it's easy to tell early on that Tyler is the one orchestrating everything and not the two men. Thursday night, I missed the first fifteen minutes or so of the episode, so, when I started watching, they were just discovering that Tyler was responsible, so maybe I'm biased here since when I went back to watch the first fifteen minutes, I obviously already knew that it was Tyler who was responsible, but I think that I still would have known. The look on Tyler's face when he is sitting in the back of the car during the very first scene is very sinister and screams that he is exactly where he wants to be. I think that they simply made the clues a bit too obvious. As yet another example, Tyler can be visibly seen at every site, again with a sinister look on his face. Other than its predictability, in my opinion, this episode is incredible.

During the final scene, my jaw literally dropped, and I was at a loss for words, which is kind of funny because I have never really trusted Nina, but I guess that maybe I was just starting to a little bit, especially in this episode when, as I mentioned before, she really seems to be genuinely concerned for and worried about Peter (which could just be because he still owes her a favor). Nina has certainly been a fantastic actress thus far, and I don't mean Blair Brown; I mean Nina. Olivia has never really trusted her either, but, like me, I think that she was starting to a little bit (of course, if so, then she still is, because the revelation that was made at the end was only made available to us, the viewers, not anyone else), and Nina has been effectively deceiving everyone from the start. It really makes me want to rewatch the first season to see if I can pinpoint any examples in which Nina has been lying. Has she been lying about virtually everything, or does she pick between what she wants to tell Fringe Division and what she doesn't?


Nina does, however, say some very interesting things that leave us guessing. She refers to the “Penrose-Carson” experiments, and from that, can we conclude that Christopher Penrose from 1.02 (“The Same Old Story”) was manufactured by Massive Dynamic, that he was indeed a clone and that Claude Penrose wasn't actually his father but instead his “guardian,” as the files call it? How many clones did they make and why? Are they making supersoldiers to combat the supersoldiers from the Other Side? Nina tells Bell that “one of the Tylers did, in fact, display a rather dramatic ability for mind control.” What does Nina mean by “ability,” and if we can answer that question, are the clones being given Cortexiphan? Perhaps the pills that Tyler were taking are Cortexiphan? Nina also tells Bell that ultimately, the trials were a success and that “mind control is possible, given the right conditions.” What are these conditions? Are they, in fact, the conditions that make up the “mind control cocktail” that Walter describes, or is it something different altogether? Again, is Cortexiphan involved, and if so, how does Cortexiphan determine who gets what ability?
 
Lastly, Nina also tells Bell that Tyler “made a misguided attempt to reunite with his surrogate mother.” What does she mean by this? Is his “mother” some type of android that Massive Dynamic created, or is she an employee of Massive Dynamic who was posing as his mother? How did his attempts to locate his mother interfere with the experiment? Even with that turn of events, it is quite clear that he could control minds. Anyway, that ending is probably the best episode closing we have gotten this season. Next week, we're going to get a lot of answers regarding the Observers, something for which I am incredibly excited. Is it just me, though, or does the promo give a little too much information? It says that they have been observing us for thousands of years, and I feel as if that's a major spoiler because that, alone, answers some questions. It confirms the theory that they do not age and also probably confirms that they are not from the alternate reality but instead from another time. Anyway, from the looks of it, we are going to meet a new Observer, August, in this episode, and I'm not just saying that based on the title of the episode. The Observer that we see ask Walter for help in the promo is not Michael Cerveris. Anyway, I would ultimately have to give “Of Human Action” eight and a half mind control cocktails, and until next week, stay on the fringe.

Fringe - "Earthling" (2.06)


"Earthling" is very complex and, in my opinion, at least, very difficult to follow. I still don't have a very clear understanding of what actually happened in this episode, but at this point, it's much clearer than it was when I first saw it. Including the time that I originally saw it aired on TV, I have seen the episode twice at this point, and in addition, I listened to the latest episode of The Fringe Podcast, which, in a lot of ways, really helped. It was very cool to have the opportunity to hear them interview Jon Cassar, who directed this episode of Fringe and who also has directed episodes of 24 for six years, and some of what he said was really interesting. Please be aware that this entry will contain spoilers regarding this episode as well as Fringe in general.

Firstly, I would like to make a correction in regards to an error that I previously made in my entry for episode 2.05, “Dream Logic.” I speculated as to why Olivia's residence would appear to look so much different from her residence in the first season. I said that it looked like an apartment and that it looked like it may have been highly elevated based on the window view we see. However, what I was failing to realize, for one reason or another, is that the team was in Seattle and that her residence was therefore not a residence at all but instead a hotel room. I am only human, I suppose, and am therefore likely to make mistakes every now and then, even ones as seemingly careless as this one. Also, I wanted to point out that our “47” shout-out during that episode is during a lab scene, but I can't recall the precise moment at which it happened, just that we see a small yellow sign on a counter that randomly says “47” on it.

Also, something else that I wanted to point out that I failed to is that not too long before “Dream Logic” aired, I learned something really interesting in my Intro to Psychology class, and that is that science on the brink of one day very soon being able to project peoples' dreams onto a screen so that we could actually see and even potentially record dreams, since all dreams really are ultimately are images in our heads that are created using electricity, essentially the same way we see an image on a television screen. What's primarily interesting about that, however, is that I remember sitting in class at the time and thinking that that would be a really cool idea for
Fringe, and although that's not really quite what “Dream Logic” deals with, it's somewhat close to it, and I suppose that I therefore found it worth mentioning. We may one day soon see something on Fringe that is closer to that concept, because as has been said before by the producers of the show, the basis of the show is typically science that some people see as potential reality, science that could one day soon be nothing but reality, and expanding on it and taking it to the extreme, so you never know.

Anyway, allow me to get back to
this episode, episode 2.06, “Earthling.” I have to say that, unfortunately, this episode really disappointed me, and there are quite a few reasons for that, all of which I will get into. Firstly, I am getting really tired of the stand-alone format. I really fear that Fringe is heading in the direction that The X-Files did, having week after week of “monster-of-the-week” episodes with the occasional mythological episode. Of course, there are some people who consider certain episodes to be “stand-alone” episodes that I don't. For example, I recently read one blog in which someone was commenting on exactly what I am commenting on now (how there have so far been too many “stand-alone” episodes in the new season), and they listed 2.03, “Fracture,” as an example, and I apologize, but “Fracture” is not a stand-alone episode. The entire case (no pun intended) was heavily involved with the Observer(s), so I'm not quite sure why that person considers “Fracture” to be a “stand-alone” episode, but it most definitely is not.

Another reason why I don't like this episode is that we received a promise from the producers back in the first season that
Fringe would not be dealing with aliens, and isn't that more or less what this episode deals with? The cosmonaut brings back a foreign organism from space which has the capability of living inside of him, bonding to him molecularly, and then projecting itself without actually leaving the host's body. Not only does this annoy me since it is seemingly a broken promise, but additionally, I don't like seeing Fringe head in this direction. First of all, we need to get back to the mythology, and second of all, I do not want to be seeing aliens inFringe. I don't want to see the paranormal that cannot be explained; I want to see science fiction, and yes, there is a difference. Lastly, The Fringe Podcast recently interviewed Jasika Nicole, who, if you don't know, plays Astrid on the show, and she said that when she read the script for this episode, she thought that it was incredible, so I guess that built my expectations up a little to high, causing me to expect something that I didn't get.

There are a couple of aspects to this episode that I do like. Firstly, it is genuinely creepy; in fact, this is definitely one of the creepiest episodes of the entire series so far if not
the creepiest. Also, I love how we get more of a backstory for Broyles. I don't remember what episode it was precisely, but I know that it was either “Midnight” (1.18) or “The Road Not Taken” (1.19). Anyway, we find out late in the first season that Broyles is divorced from his wife by his recommendation to Olivia of an attorney to help Rachel get through her divorce; now, we finally see that explored a bit further. We find out why Broyles and his wife split, so in some ways, I suppose that that does make this episode a little bit important. Anyway, this episode portrays Broyles in a much different light, in opposition to the light we have been primarily seeing him in prior to this episode. We see Broyles as being somewhat robotic and very stoic. However, we see a much more humane side of him in this episode, such as the scene at the beginning of the episode when we see him playing a mimicking game with a small child, a game that results in the biggest and happiest smile that we've seen on his face during the entirety of the series thus far.

I think that this may be the very first Broyles-centric episode we have gotten so far. In fact, now that I think about it, Olivia, in this episode, seems like a supporting character, which is very odd. I am still incredibly frustrated because I'd really like to see the “super-hearing” that we see in “Night of Desirable Objects” (2.02) explained. I am really hoping that that isn't going to be abandoned. The scene between her and Broyles is really heartbreaking, especially the quote that we get from him when he explains why the case is so important to him. He says that his wife left him because he became so obsessed with it, and he says, “I took this job to make this world a safer place for my family. Instead, I lost them.” One thing that I am wondering is who Patricia is. During the scene in which Broyles and Senator Van Horn are discussing Broyles' involvement in the case and how Van Horn thinks that he should hand it over to the CIA (which is somehow odd and therefore worth mentioning, since we also see this happen in episode 1.15, “Inner Child”), Broyles leaves but before he does so, he says to Van Horn, “Please give my regards to Patricia.” The only thought that comes to my mind is that Patricia is Van Horn's wife who he is still married to, so that was Broyles' way of saying, “Don't you forget that I sacrificed my marriage for this.”

Speaking of his marriage, I suppose that it is nice to have seen his wife, but honestly, not that it really matters or has any powerful bearing on the series, but even though she says that she is genuinely happy for him, I still detected a very strong scent of sarcasm, as if she were saying, “How wonderful of you to come all the way here to tell me that you solved the case that ended our marriage. Would you like a medal?” Of course, that is most likely extreme, but you surely get my point. She definitely comes off as sarcastic to me, especially considering that look that she gave him before she closed the door. Of course, I guess that I shouldn't really say that she “gave” him the look, since his back was turned and he therefore didn't see it, but, again, you get my point. What was that look for, and what did it mean, I wonder? Again, I know that it doesn't really matter, but I am curious, and I'm just speculating about everything that this episode has to offer, since there isn't all that much. In addition, I really don't have any idea who the mysterious man at the end of the episode is, and that's not due to confusion; even Cassar said in the podcast that he is credited as “Mystery Man,” so none of us know, but what I am wondering is what he means when he looks up at the sky. He is so mysteriously vague, and I suppose that they sent the cosmonaut back into space?

There were some really funny scenes during this episode, as there always are. For example, I really like the scene in which Walter is trying to solve the equation, and he therefore has an opera playing rather loudly, and there were two reasons why I really laughed at this scene. Firstly, it was great seeing Olivia and Broyles arrive only to see what they are most likely used to by know, especially Olivia, which is, as Peter articulated in an episode during the first season, “Bishop's House of Horrors.” Secondly, Walter's fit that he throws when the music was turned down was hilarious. John Noble is simply brilliant, and it was funny, because it's as if he was saying, “You can't expect me to work without the music!” I also find that to be really odd because as I have said before, in the first comic book, when Walter first meets Bell, Walter is working quietly in his lab while Bell is working with very loud music playing, and Walter storms down the hallway demanding that it be turned down since he can't think with the music playing so loudly, and now, we see just the opposite. Have Walter and Bell's consciences possibly been intertwined somehow, in that there is a little bit of William Bell in Walter and vice versa?

Speaking of William Bell, I have recently discovered that Leonard Nimoy may not be returning to the show, and although I somewhat agree with his reasoning, I don't at all agree with his solution. He says that he can't see where Bell's character is going anywhere, and I agree that his character is being delivered very slowly and in very small bits. In fact, more or less, he has been used as nothing more than a mechanism to provide answers, and that is probably frustrating Nimoy. However, if your problem is that you don't think that your character is being developed in an efficient fashion, then how is leaving the show a good solution? The best solution, to me, seems to be to stay on the show to give the producers the opportunity to develop your character, because after all, how can they do that if you're not on the show anymore? I really hope that this is just politics or that he is going to change his mind, because we need Bell on the show, and we need answers not
from him but about him.

Another concept that this episode plays around with is obviously the possibility of foreign Fringe Science, specifically, in this episode, Russian Fringe Science. In this way, even though Cassar says that it was purely coincidental, this episode does have some similarities to
24, such as the foreign threat (and I mean the Russian, not the alien) and Broyles' meeting with the senator, just to name a couple of examples. It also simply has a very 24-feel to it, and I think that I would have felt that even if I didn't know beforehand that Cassar was directing it. It isn't a terrible episode, but it isn't by any means one of my absolute favorites either. I think that another reason that it may have disappointed me is that it is the first episode returning from the hiatus, and I don't feel fully satisfied. Anyway, I would like to talk more about some of the aforementioned topics that Cassar discusses in the podcast that I found interesting, but most of what he talks about is in regards to directing TV shows and films, which obviously doesn't really pertain to this. Ultimately, I am going to give “Earthling” five and a half Dirt Devils, and be sure to tune in for the new episode this week called “Of Human Action,” an episode that I'm not feeling too great about since based on what I saw from the promo, it doesn't look very original, but then again, that's what I initially said about “Dream Logic” as well, and that ended up being a decent episode, so we'll see soon enough, I suppose. Until then, stay on the fringe.

Fringe - "Dream Logic" (2.05)


Before I begin my discussion of this episode, firstly, I would like to start by saying that if you have not seen this episode yet but would like to see it, then please, don't read any further, because this entry does contain spoilers, and secondly, I would like to clarify a few small things that pertain to the two most recent episodes, "Fracture" and "Momentum Deferred." For starters, just a few days ago, I caught another instance in "Fracture" (2.03) in which Peter refers to Olivia by her last name, which I am pretty sure brings the count up to three instead of two. Right before she goes into the bathroom while she and Peter are speaking to Dan Gillespie's wife and she is acting really strange, Peter says, "Are you okay, Dunham?" I just felt that I should probably clarify that since I had previously said that he calls her Dunham twice, and again, I want to reiterate how strange I find that to be for him to call her by her last name when he is either in the presence of Walter and Astrid or when he's directly speaking to her, as he is two out of the three times that he does it, and in the entry in which I discuss that, which I think is the entry I wrote for "Fracture" itself, I talk about why it bothered me so much, so I don't really want to rehash all of that.

In addition, last week, I offered the possibility that the reason why Rebecca looks at Peter so strangely near the end of "Momentum Deferred" (2.04) is because perhaps she is his mother in this reality, and although I am not fully sure if I want to throw that out the window just yet, since it is indeed still plausible (even though I never said that I was drinking the Kool-Aid just yet), I now know that that is not really the purpose of that scene. The purpose of that scene is to more or less confirm to us that Peter is indeed from the alternate reality, and that is why he stuck out; she sees people that don't belong here, that are not supposed to be in this reality since they come from the alternate reality. According to the
Fringe Podcast, you can see him glow during the aforementioned scene, but I did not catch either of the two times that I watched it, so I think that I will most likely return to that scene and see for myself, because it had to have been pretty faint if I didn't see it either time.

Well, the first part of this episode that I want to talk about is Walter's apparent fear of Seattle. I felt really sorry for him because when he is in the lab set up for him and is about to conduct the first autopsy, he appears to be having a panic attack, and he even looks like he's on the verge of tears. I wonder why it is that being in Seattle upset him so badly. I mean, he says that the air in Seattle reminds him of St. Claire's (and, of course, I love how the writers
had to have Walter say what St. Claire's is for those who have not been keeping up with the show), but something tells me that there's more to it than that. Something seems to terrify him, and he wanted nothing more than to get out of there; I don't think that he would have even chosen food over getting out of there. Could it have had anything to do with the final scene of the episode? Perhaps Peter being in Seattle helped him remember something that Walter is hoping Peter would have repressed? Then again, that couldn't be it, because Walter is panicking in the episode, because he is in Seattle, not because Peter is. I'm not sure, but I'm thinking that it must have something to do with the final scene. From what I took from that scene, Walter hears whatever Peter says during his "dream," and it's easy to see from the look on his face that he is terrified, and I'm thinking that it has something to do with the final scene. This could be nothing more than mere speculation, but I'm wondering if it is at all possible that it has something to do with Peter being stolen from the alternate reality by Walter.

"Dream Logic," like "Night of Desirable Objects," is yet another "stand-alone" episode that doesn't seem to have anything to do with the show's mythology, which is a bit disappointing, but at the same time, for a "stand-alone" episode, this was a decent episode, and I give it seven and a half business cards. It keeps you entertained and on the edge of your seat throughout almost the entire episode. There's just one aspect to the episode that makes no sense to me. Dr. Nayak is apparently stealing dreams, and he becomes addicted to this. Olivia uses her stepfather (who is once again mentioned, which only further helps support my theory that he is going to be of importance later in the series) as an example because she says that he was one person when he was sober and a totally different person when he was "smashed," and she says that this was due to his addiction because apparently, an addiction brings out a Jekyll and Hyde aspect in you, but the reason that this made no sense to me is that if her stepfather was behaving one way when he was sober and a completely different way when he was drunk, then that was because when he was drunk, he was under the influence of alcohol, not because he was addicted to it. Perhaps Olivia is implying that the dreams themselves cause him to be someone else? I do have to say that for a "stand-alone" episode, this episode is pretty complex and even confusing.

Throughout the episode, I was wondering what was going on with the business cards. The first time, I didn't think much of it. I figured that it was just an unnecessary line of fluff that the writers decided to include, but then, the second time that she asks for a business card, I knew that there was definitely something going on, but I had no idea what; I never stopped to think that perhaps it has something to do with Weiss, since the scene in which he says something like he hopes that she has no problem with the color red is never concluded. That, of course, makes no sense to me, but I don't think that it's really supposed to make a great deal of sense to anyone. How does his procedure result in what Charlie told Olivia when she first met him, and why red? Last season, there were a few episodes that seemed to be color-centric, and it would seem as if this is another one, because there was the red that Weiss wants Olivia to look for on what people are wearing, and then, there is the color of the dials in Dr. Nayak's house when Peter and Olivia arrive at the end of the episode, which are set to red.

I am very happy to have seen Weiss again. I feared that at the end of episode 2.03, "Fracture," when Olivia walks up to him and pulls a gun to his head without using her cane, and he says to take care, that we weren't going to see him anymore, but apparently, he is still going to have an importance on the show, and I'm happy about that, because I have really taking a liking to him. Once again, there is no Jessup on the show, and that makes me happy while simultaneously frustrating me. It makes me happy, because as I have said before, it's going to take me a little while to warm up to her, because at this point, she doesn't have much of a purpose on the show, but that's exactly why I am frustrated. I
want to like her, and I want her purpose to be made clear, but neither of those goals can be accomplished if she is repeatedly not on the show.

I am also really happy to see that Charlie's death is taking such a toll on Olivia because that is what I was hoping would happen. I feared that there was a slight possibility that the writers would kind of just brush it off and move on, but Olivia is hurting badly in this episode, and I knew that she would be. The scene that is especially painful to watch is when she and Peter are having the conversation about her first time meeting him, and before she tells him the story, her eyes glance to the photograph of the two of them together (Olivia and Charlie), and the both of them have wide smiles across their faces. Then, after she's done telling the story, she says something like she is just going to have to accept the fact that he's gone and that he's not coming back, and as her voice breaks, her eyes begin to fill with tears, and so did mine.

I am wondering if it was at all a "hint-hint" when she says that he is never coming back, a hint that he will indeed be coming back, since he will come back from the alternate reality. I think that I might actually have a theory here. We now know that one of Olivia's "abilities" is to travel between realities without the fatal consequences that most would face, and we know this based on what Bell tells her in the previous episode, "Momentum Deferred," so since she knows this now, what if she eventually tries to bring alter-Charlie over from the alternate reality? I have a really troubling feeling that based on this episode's final scene, Peter is going to find out very soon that he does not belong in this reality, that Walter brought him here from the alternate one, and when that happens, it's going to light up a bulb in Olivia's head, and she is consequently going to realize that she can do the same thing, that she can bring alter-Charlie here; that's just my theory, and I think that it's a pretty sound one based on the evidence that I have given to support it.

Anyway, as I was saying, I am very happy with the tribute being paid to Charlie, and I am very happy that they tacked on that scene in which Olivia goes to his grave-site to visit him, even though I think that I would have been even happier if the tribute scene had been more like a ceremony, with Peter, Walter, Broyles, and so forth all there to pay honor, but perhaps we'll still get that a little bit down the road, and speaking of what we'll get down the road, where are Rachel and Ella? We see Rachel in the premiere episode when she visits the hospital to see Olivia, but after that, we have not seen her, and I'm wondering if she has moved out of Olivia's residence due to her ex wanting custody of Ella, as we find out in episode 1.18, "Midnight." That issue has not been resolved, but since Rachel tells Peter that she left Ella with her babysitter in the premiere episode ("A New Day in the Old Town"), even if Rachel has moved out, I'm assuming that she still has custody of her.

I do have a theory regarding this issue, even though it's not a really a theory as much as it is putting two and two together. There was a promo for the new season that aired at the end of the season finale last spring, and so far, not one shred of the footage that is in that promo has been anything that we've seen this season so far (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n3GS4jNERc), and if you recall, the first season was initially supposed to have twenty-two episodes, and then, at the last minute, it was decided that the season would be cut to twenty episodes due to
American Idol taking Fringe off the air for so long and also due to Glee being on the week after the finale was actually on, so I think that there are "lost" episodes floating out there somewhere that we unfortunately will probably never see, and I mention this now, because to further help support this possibility, in the finale episode, "There's More than One of Everything" (1.20), Olivia is sitting on her bed when Nina calls her to tell her that she would like to hold her end of the bargain and set up a meeting with William Bell for her, and on the bed with Olivia is what appears to be a packed suitcase, so is it possible that that suitcase is Rachel's suitcase?

Something that I would really like to see out of this season is some substance on the "super-hearing" that we see in episode 2.02, "Night of Desirable Objects." It is abandoned after that episode, and in the next episode, "Fracture," the headaches become the problem, and if I remember correctly, Olivia doesn't even mention the "super-hearing" to Weiss, which I don't understand. She's so anxious to be "fixed" and to find answers that she puts a gun to his head, yet she doesn't tell him everything that there is to tell. Why does she experience the "super-hearing," and why does it suddenly stop? Anyway, as most of you probably know, we're unfortunately saying goodbye to
Fringe for three weeks, due to baseball. The next new episode ("Earthling") will air November 5th and will apparently focus on victims crumbling into dust (let's hope that this one ties into the mythology somehow). I think that I said in my last entry that the break would be at least two weeks, but it's definitely going to be three, which is a downer, but the bright side is that I would much rather that it take a few three-week breaks throughout the season than take two two-month breaks. Until November 5th, though, stay on the fringe.

Fringe - "Momentum Deferred" (2.04)


Needless to say, I have quite a bit to write about this week because this is one of the absolute best episodes of the entire series thus far, and even though there are a couple of things that disappointed me about the episode, which is why I really cannot give it a perfect score, ultimately giving it nine frozen heads, it is most definitely up there with my very favorites, which include, at this point, "Ability" (1.14), "The Road Not Taken" (1.19) and "A New Day in the Old Town" (2.01). A great deal of questions are answered in this episode, which I think is why it has seemingly already gone down in the Fringe community as legendary. Of course, one of the two things that I just mentioned that disappointed me about the episode is that I think that this episode perhaps answered too much in one episode because now, it seems to me as if they're going to have to initiate new plots in order to keep the show interesting. However, this episode is ultimately epic, so I'm not really making any major complaints. If you have not seen this episode yet but would like to at some eventual point in time, then I urge you not to read any further than this, because it will contain spoilers.

The primary aspect of this episode that really disappointed me is that they did almost exactly what I said in my last entry that I was really hoping that they wouldn't, which is that in this episode, Charlie's "shapeshifter" body snatcher is killed off, which effectively ends Charlie's story, in this reality anyway. We do, of course, hopefully still have the alter-Charlie to deal with, a Charlie who, for one reason or another which has not been divulged yet, has a scar on the side of his face. At this point, my thought is that his scar is related to what happened to him in this reality, as in the shapeshifter killing him and throwing his seemingly strangled body into the furnace, but that's really all I have to offer. I have no idea whatsoever 
how the two are related or if they even are. Anyway, I'm wondering if this shapeshifter will even be given a name eventually. Like I said, Charlie is dismissively disbanded in the premiere episode, and now, even his doppelanger is seemingly dismissively disbanded; all it takes are a few failed gunshots to his heart and then one fatal one to his head in just one scene.

It is really nice to see Broyles act as a fatherly figure for Olivia at a point that she really needs it and comforts her, assuring her that Charlie's death is not her fault. He really seems to be undergoing some type of change; in "Fracture," he actually smiles near the end of the episode when they effectively prevent Burgess from crystallizing and exploding, and now, in a vehemently caring and gentle manner (for him), he comforts Olivia; it's a bit odd, but anyway, my point here is that I really would have liked to have seen the "evil Charlie" mythology pan out throughout more of the season than merely the first four episodes, and even that only consisted of three, since Charlie was not in last week's episode. He had better get some sort of ceremony to commemorate him; if John Scott was given one back in episode 1.03, then seriously, Charlie had better get one. Perhaps then we could see Olivia grieve with a bit more intensity. Granted, they don't have a body since it's by now burned to ashes, but they didn't have Scott's body either; Nina did at Massive Dynamic.

Speaking of Charlie not being in last week's episode, by the way, this week marked the second week in a row that Jessup was not on the show, and in the second episode ("Night of Desirable Objects"), the most recent episode in which she was featured, she didn't even have a speaking part if I am remembering correctly. Don't assume that I'm complaining, of course, because trust me, I'm not. I really do not like Jessup from the small amount of time we have seen her in action. As has been previously mentioned on
The Fringe Podcast, if you notice, like Olivia, Jessup seems to stick to dark colors such as grey and black. Olivia will occasionally wear something like pale blue, but you'll never see her in pink or yellow or orange or even green if I am correct; it's always dull colors. My point, therefore, is that I am being left to wonder if perhaps Jessup is a Cortexiphan child as well, and if so, what the writers' feel they are achieving by adding another Olivia to the show. She is not needed, and I read somewhere (I believe it was Entertainment Weekly) that Jessup's purpose is to add a spiritual element to the show's mythology, but as most of us in the Fringe community seemed to agree last season, fans don't really want this; leave religion out of Fringe. I am assuming, based on the scene near the end of 2.01, that she is looking for ways to tie Fringe Division cases to the Bible, and again, based on the aforementioned scene, she is seemingly managing to do so successfully. I honestly just don't feel that adding this component to the show is going to do anything constructive for it. Forgive me for the comparison (even though I'm sure the writers would eat it up), but we really don't need a Scully on the show either.

As I said before, we receive a great multitude of answers from this episode, too many to list off, so I'll just try to hit the key points here. Previously, we wondered what happened between Bell and Olivia at the conclusion of the first season when we see that Olivia is standing inside the World Trade Center, which, in this reality, was never struck down, and now, we know what happened, and we know what was said. That actually leads me directly into a theory that I want to share, and that is that I think that William Bell may be Olivia's father, and I say that because as far as I know, Olivia has never mentioned her father before. In "The Ghost Network," she mentions her stepfather, but not once does she mention her father if I'm correct, which leads me to believe that there's a chance that she doesn't remember him, and the kind of warmth that he shows her seems to be incredibly fatherly which I interpret as meaning more than just having conducted the Cortexiphan trials on her when she was a child. Based on this episode, he really seems to love her, as in compassionately love her like a father would love his child. Here, another question is answered because we find out why Olivia speaks in Greek to Peter when she wakes from her "coma." William Bell tells Olivia to say that to Peter to help get him on her side and that he would know what it meant. We, of course, know that it means "be a better man than your father," which leads me to my next theory. As I said last season, I think that Bell is actually Walter, and Walter is actually Bell since they at one point in time switched consciousnesses; why else would Bell want Olivia to say this to Peter?

Another question that is answered for us in this episode is why "Charlie" had seemed to be in severe pain, and kudos to Courtney of
The Fringe Podcast for calling it almost entirely. "Charlie" had been in pain because he had been taking on his appearance for too long, and he can't shapeshift because his device is broken. Therefore, he was beginning to permanently become Charlie because you're only supposed to take on an alternate appearance for a certain amount of time. We also now know where the shapeshifters are from and what they want; they are from the alternate reality, and they are taking part in a war against this reality; we just don't quite know why yet. Their purpose, based on what Nina says to Olivia about Bell believing that no two objects could occupy the same space simultaneously and that therefore, if the two realities were to collide, only one would survive, is to eliminate our reality, but the question as to why still remains. Speaking of Nina's demonstration involving the two snow globes, I found it to be quite odd that (a) she conveniently happens to have two identical snow globes on hand at the time (I mean, they couldn't have meant much to her since she, with no hesitation, slammed them into each other), and that (b) conveniently, only one of them breaks when she forces them to collide so that her analogy would make sense. I suppose that I just found it be somewhat funny by all senses of the word.

Returning to Charlie once again, Kirk Acevedo's acting in this episode is incredibly exquisite. We have never seen him like this before, and between "Night of Desirable Objects" and this episode, I have been extremely impressed, especially by the scene in this episode in which he empties thermometers he just bought of their mercury and pours it into a Slusho container to drink; that scene is, to say the least,
creepy! Even my brother, Cody, said that it made him shiver. We have never seen Acevedo take on that kind of persona, and he really pulls it off, and it's sad that he's no longer on the show now, minus the scenes that we will hopefully see of him in the alternate reality. Last season, when Acevedo apparently posted something on his Facebook about having been fired from the show, the writers' response was that it was absolutely not true and that, if anything, we would literally be seeing a lot more of him in the second season, so what I'm thinking is that he somehow found out about Charlie being killed off in the premiere episode and then reacted by assuming that he was off the show, which I think is what most people would assume in that situation.

This story involving Rebecca surprised me because I didn't think that we'd be seeing any more of her; I figured that the small amount of time in which we see her in the premiere episode when Walter shows the team the video of her talking about the shapeshifters was all we were going to see of her, but no, we get to meet her in present day time, and she has a strikingly odd resemblance to Lena Olin, who played Irina Derevko on
Alias. Speaking of Alias, our "forty-seven" shoutout this week is Walter saying that he found that 47% of the shapeshifters' blood is mercury. I don't think that there is a reference every single week, but there is quite often. For example, in episode 1.14, "Ability," the device that Jones arms is located on a 47th floor. In the premiere episode, the camera very quickly shows a yellow sign that says "47" on the street during the scene near the beginning in which Jessup is questioning Peter and giving him a hard time. Last week, on "Fracture," Walter says that he stopped counting the needlemarks in Gillespie's feet after forty-seven. I'm always listening for it, and I know that it's been on the show more than in just these instances. Yet another example is when Broyles tells Olivia in the pilot episode about forty-seven children having gone missing for years and then suddenly showing up not having aged at all.

Anyway, allow me to return to my point. I like Rebecca's character because she gives Walter a love interest, but at the same time, if Walter needs a love interest, then why can't we just find out who Peter's mother is already? At first, I wondered if Rebecca is possibly Peter's mother, since she says that she saw him somewhere before right before the drugs kick in and she comically says, "Whoa, here we go!" Also, she gives him an odd look near the end of the episode and then brushes it off, but that doesn't make sense because you would think that Peter would remember her, so that was when I dismissed that theory. I suppose that it's possible that in this reality, Rebecca is his mother, and in another reality, someone else is; therefore, in this reality, he wouldn't recognize Rebecca as his mother because he's not originally from this reality. However, Rebecca saying that she has seen Peter somewhere before doesn't fit in that case because you would think that she should most definitely know where.

The episode initially kind of frustrated me because I thought that we were supposed to know whose head it is at the end of the episode, and I had no idea whose it is; it wasn't anyone I recognize. Throughout the episode, when the shapeshifters are discussing the head that they need, they describe the head as belonging to someone who tried to cross over into the alternate reality, and since the keyword there is 
tried, my assumption was that they are talking about Jones, but that definitely isn't Jones at the end of the episode, which is disappointing because first of all, since we have no idea who that is, it made for somewhat of a lousy cliffhanger, and second of all, I want Jones back so badly; he is one of the coolest villains ever, and we had better at least get to see, like Charlie, alter-Jones. Before that, however, the next episode is titled "Dream Logic," and it apparently involves a man who is convinced that his boss is a horned demon, and I am incredibly skeptical about this episode because, again, I really don't mean to draw this comparison, but there is an X-Files episode with an almost identical plot, so they had better do something with this to set it apart and make it unique. Also, I just recently found out that after "Dream Logic," the show is going on a hiatus for at least two weeks, possibly more, due to the World Series. The week after "Dream Logic," FOX will air the second season premiere, "A New Day in the Old Town," but then, the week after that, it won't be on at all. This is disappointing news, but hopefully, episode 2.06 will be worth the wait. I thought that it was odd that Fringe Bloggers didn't have any promo pics for anything past "Dream Logic," and now, I know why. Well, until then, stay on the fringe!

Fringe - "Fracture" (2.03)


"Fracture" is definitely a step-up from the last episode, "Night of Desirable Objects."As I said in my entry regarding that episode, I'm not really sure why it was decided to jump into such a "stand-alone," "monster of the week"-like story so early into the season, the second episode, in fact, but I could go on for quite a while about that, and I won't. This episode, though, took not only listening to the latest episode of the Fringe Podcast but also a re-watch of the episode itself in order for me to fully understand it. I usually do watch each episode at least a couple of times before writing an entry, anyway, but this time, I was incredibly confused by this episode, but now, not only do I fully understand the episode but I also very much appreciate it a lot more. It's definitely not on my Top 5, but it's a decent episode, and I give it seven and a half crystallized ears. I warn you before I begin my analysis of this episode, however, that it will contain spoilers, so if you haven't seen the episode yet but would like to, then please don't read any further.

This episode, unlike "Night of Desirable Objects," sticks to the mythology of
Fringe, which I am very happy about. I recall last fall when I saw episode 1.04, "The Arrival," that I initially thought that the Observer is a "bad guy," because it seems as if he orchestrates the crane collision at the beginning of the episode; however, throughout the season, we are led to believe differently, such as when we find out that he saved Walter and Peter's lives and also at the finale when he and Walter have that conversation on the beach. Now, it's once again being called into question that he is indeed a villain, that he, as well as all of the other Observers, are here to collect data in regards to our technology and then use it against us, which is interesting to think about. Why? For what purpose would they want to harm us with our own technology?

There are a couple of things that I find really interesting about this episode. Once again, Broyles is not handed a case to give to Fringe Division. It finds a case on its own and then handles it seemingly without having to go through any channels; if I recall correctly, we don't even see Olivia or Peter discussing anything with Broyles before they initiate their investigation. Perhaps, we are just supposed to infer that they have already been granted permission, but anyway, my point is that it's really interesting how Astrid randomly pulls up this case out of thin air, and then, it ends up having such a close tie to Fringe Division; it is directly related to the Observers. Is this a coincidence, or can this be taken as a sign that Astrid is possibly a mole? Was she aware of the case already and for some reason, wanted Fringe Division involved, so she pretended like she just happened to stumble across it? I'm just throwing ideas out there.

Up until the final scene of this episode, I thought that we were getting yet another standalone episode, and that was a major part of the reason why. Since Astrid just randomly pulls up the case file on the computer, I didn't think that it was related to the mythology, which is also due to there seemingly being nothing to give you the impression that it's headed in a mythological direction throughout the episode up until the ending. Of course, I never put two and two together, because right in the first scene of the episode, Gillespie is told on the phone by the colonel that he is to apprehend a man with a trenchcoat and a briefcase, and I never thought of the Observer. So, I'm guessing that the Observers have people that are working for them and helping them collect this data? That is, of course, if Gordon is to be believed, which, of course, is unclear at this point. We don't even know yet whether or not Boone was lying when he implicated William Bell funds ZFT at the end of episode 1.18, "Midnight."

The ending of this episode is fantastic; it is, by far, one of the absolute best cliffhangers we have gotten so far. As soon as I saw all of the pepper that was being poured onto the food, I knew who Gordon was talking about, and I knew that we were about to see the Observer, which we did, and that itself was a pretty killer ending, but then, it gets even better when we see that this "data," this data that is apparently a danger to us all, is, in this case (no pun intended), Walter. Is this why the Observer saved Walter and Peter when they drove into the ice? Obviously, he is incredibly crucial to a larger picture, and the Observers know this, or at least, our Observer does, who is apparently called September. If I recall correctly, J.J. did say something about the second season answering some questions about the Observer, so I guess that this episode was used as a method to help kick this part of the mythology back into effect.

The scene prior to the very final scene is amazing, as well, and, of course, I am referring to Olivia's scene with Sam Weiss at the bowling alley. She begins to feel incredibly frustrated with him, because he isn't giving her any answers, or at least, he is giving them to her very slowly and in "Yoda crap," so she pulls her gun on him and demands that since she was told he could help her, she wants him to stop playing games and to do just that, to help her. However, what she doesn't realize at first is that she walks over to him with her gun pulled out with no hesitation, and she leaves her walker (which she has been using since her "accident" to help her get around) behind; I just love that scene so much, because obviously, he did help her, and she just needed to be in a heightened state of emotion (anger, in this case) to realize.

One very small aspect of the episode that I didn't like was Peter calling Olivia by her last name not once but twice. My guess is that it's just an effect of having more than one writer on the show, but I found it to be incredibly out of character for him to call her Dunham. I can perhaps understand if he was talking to Broyles or someone like that, but then again, in the premiere episode, he even called her Olivia when he was talking to Broyles ("We were too late for Olivia."), but he was first talking to Walter and Astrid, and then the second time, he was talking to Olivia herself. First, there was the scene near the beginning of the episode when Astrid, Peter and Walter take interest in the case, and Peter says, "I'll call Dunham," and then, there is the scene in which Olivia feels sick at the Gillespie home, so she goes to the bathroom, and Peter follows after her to see if she is okay, calling her Dunham. I could also understand it if we were talking about an episode early in the first season, but at this point, it is very out of character for him to be calling her by her last name.

I am disappointed that there is no "Charlie" in this episode, but at the same time, it makes me happy because the shapeshifter snatching Charlie's body in the premiere episode adds a lot to the mythology, and maybe, their plan is to prolong it for a little while, and the reason why I am hoping that this is what is planned is because I can't believe that Charlie is dead, and it's really sad how he is killed off, as I have mentioned before. He is basically dismissed, thrown into a furnace; we don't even see the scene in which he is actually killed, so I would hope that they at least prolong his story a little bit instead of immediately exposing it. It will make the scene that much more epic, as well. Like I have said already, I am bracing my heart, because the scene in which Olivia finds out is going to be very difficult to watch. Charlie is her best friend, and inside of the FBI, before she met Peter or Broyles or anyone else, he was really the only person she trusted besides John Scott. I would imagine that finding out is really going to damage her, and I'm going to be vehemently enraged if it doesn't, if the writers more or less decide to brush it off. I am, on the other hand, not the least bit disappointed that Jessup is not in the episode, because as I have said before, I am not a Jessup fan, really. We need to get to know more about her before I feel anything for her, because at this point, I'm not following her purpose.

Then, of course, there is J.J.'s usual shout-out to
Alias when Walter says that he stops counting the needlemarks in Gillespie toes after forty-seven. There is also a possible Wizard of Oz reference between the last two episodes that I didn't catch at first; the credit actually goes to the Fringe Podcast. Last week, we had the scarecrow motif, and this week, we have Project: Tinman. This could be a bit of a stretch, but is it possible that Olivia is supposed to represent Dorothy in the premiere episode, since she visited an alternate world and then came back? I don't know, but I'm definitely going to be looking for a possible Cowardly Lion homage this week. Hopefully, these references are not just random and actually have an agenda, but I would probably need to talk to someone who is better at deciphering those kinds of clues than I am. I do the best that I can, but I'm not always really good at really deep analysis, so if anyone wants to offer a possible reason for including these Wizard of Oz references, that would be appreciated. Perhaps, they're just reflecting the tastes of the writers, but I feel like there is probably more to it than that.

The final aspect of this episode that I want to discuss is Olivia and Peter's trip to Iraq. I thought that it was really cool how this called for something that we saw in the pilot episode, which was Peter being in Iraq, which is where Olivia finds him and "asks" him to go back to America with her. Peter's shaky past is brought into a very dim light once again, as Ahmed is surprised that Peter would want to save these peoples' lives, because there was apparently once a time when Peter didn't have any regard for lives. Ahmed seems very bitter toward Peter to me, which makes me wonder if maybe the deformity on his face was a result of something that Peter did, maybe not something that he did directly but instead a result of a decision that he made. I found it funny when Peter clearly sees that Olivia is hiding something when he asks her about the headaches, and she says that the doctors said that she might get them but that they are normal. The look on his face displays extreme and utter frustration, but then, when she asks him about his past while they're in Iraq, he tells her that he doesn't want to talk about it. I was wondering how it was that Olivia knew even a little Arabic, of course. Maybe learning it was part of her training? Then again, if she was required to learn it as part of her training, it would seem as if she'd know more than just a little bit of it; Peter even seems really surprised that she knows any of it.

Next week's episode is called "Momentum Deferred," which was originally titled "This Is the Night Mail." I'm not sure why the title was changed, but perhaps "Momentum Deferred" will prove to be a better title; I shall find out soon enough. I honestly didn't really understand why 2.03 was called "Fracture," but maybe I should just think longer and harder on it, or maybe there is more than one meaning of the word. Additionally, for those of you who are interested, as I have said before, I think that the show's second season will focus a lot more on who the Observer(s) is/are and what his/their role(s) is/are, and I actually found out a while ago that episode 2.08, which, assuming that there are no breaks, will air on November 5th, is titled "August," and as we know, the Observer that we know (played by Michael Cerveris) is called September, so it's very likely that this episode will be dealing very heavily with the Observers, and it's possible that we will meet a new one. Until then, though, stay on the fringe.

Fringe - "Night of Desirable Objects" (2.02)


The second episode of the new season is a major letdown after the premiere which really disappoints me. I don't understand why, considering the fact that this is only the second episode into the new season, it was decided to air a "stand-alone" episode like this that has absolutely nothing to do with the overarching story, but at the same time, it is an incredibly entertaining episode, and I do have to give it some credit for that. Admittedly, however, throughout some of the episode, I thought that it was doing the big "no-no" in my book and recycling anX-Files idea, but, as I was happy to see, it goes in a much different direction, which I will discuss later in this entry. As I always do, though, I warn you that if you have not seen this episode yet but would like to see it, then please, don't read any further, as this entry does contain a fair amount of spoilers.

"Night of Desirable Objects" opens in a much similar fashion as typical "monster-of-the-week" shows do, such as The X-Files (not that I'm drawing comparisons, because trust me, if you're trying to tell me that the two are very different shows and to therefore stop reaching for comparisons, then you're preaching to the choir) or even House (except a House episode can't exactly be given the title "monster-of-the-week" unless you want to consider whatever the bacteria, virus, etc. of the episode is as a "monster"). It opens with people that we don't know, people that we've never seen before on the show. We don't see Olivia or Peter or Walter or anyone else, just these people, and after the show's title sequence ends, then we see how our beloved team becomes involved in what we see happen before the title sequence began. Like I said, I was very disappointed. There are no shape-shifters (except for a little bit of Charlie's doppelganger), and there is almost nothing relating to the Other Side (again, except for a little bit of Charlie's doppelganger, and also for us seeing a little bit of Olivia's side effects of having crossed over).

Again, this is something that I don't quite appreciate, because after the mythology-infested premiere that we got last week, this didn't give us much to follow up on, and for that reason, I'm not going to talk much about the episode's primary plot line, which involves a man who fused scorpion DNA with the DNA of his unborn son in order to protect it from the mother's Lupus, which would have otherwise attacked the child and killed it. Ultimately, what happened is the baby clawed its way out of its casket and lived underground, attacking and thereby killing its "prey" with a blue liquid which paralyzes it. What I was referring to earlier in regards to my initial fear is that when the paralyzing substance is mentioned, I immediately thought of The X-Files episode 6.21 titled "Field Trip," in which some sort of underground plant life poisons and paralyzes its prey and then devours them while they are in a dream state. Fortunately, it doesn't go down that road, not even close. The road that it does go down involves some pretty interesting stuff, but there are two reasons why it disappointed me, one of which I already talked about.

The other reason why it disappointed me is because it kind of reminded me of "The No-Brainer" last season, because in "The No-Brainer," Paul Dempsey seemingly has no affiliation with ZFT; the computer "virus" which he develops which basically hypnotizes people and then turns their brains into liquid goo is developed, because Dempsey feels that he was wronged when he was fired from his job, so he therefore kills his former boss's loved ones. It was personal and had nothing to do with the show's mythology. However, I forgave that episode, because it needed to be shown that science and technology has become so "out of control" that you don't need to be some criminal mastermind such as a member of ZFT in order to develop something like this; virtually anyone can. Dempsey was able to exact revenge on those close to the man who fired him by using a very technologically advanced weapon, a computer virus that kills, and although it cannot be ruled out, there is no evidence to support a theory that he was affiliated with ZFT.

However, with this episode, even though I suppose you could make that same argument, that argument is going to get old after a while if there are too many episodes like that, but since I'm pretty sure that this was the only one besides "The No-Brainer," I suppose that I can forgive it one more time. I suppose that there does need to be episodes like this occasionally not only to show what I just talked about but also to show that as FBI agents (which I suppose Peter technically is now), the Fringe Division isn't only going to be investigating matters that pertain to ZFT and William Bell, etc. As I just said, science and technology has progressed to a point where it cannot be stopped, and the show does need to show that this applies in the "real world," as well, that your average but smart criminal can accomplish a great deal with science and technology since it is so monstrously out of control.

I do think that the episode delivers some mythology, though. I was really happy to see that Olivia is not out of the hospital, all better for now with what happened to her seemingly off her mind until it's convenient for the writers to have it bother her again like X so frequently did. The fact that she can't remember what happened to her is still weighing her down, and I really like how we see her check out of the hospital, and then at the end, see her seemingly desperate to hunt down answers. This is what I don't understand, though. Why can't she remember meeting William Bell? Now, obviously, that's part of the mythology, and we're not supposed to know at the moment, but that's not what I mean. I might have this wrong, but I seem to recall her remembering going to visit someone before she switched realities, so you would think that she would remember the few days before it happened and therefore remember her obsession with trying to find William Bell and thus put two and two together.

This question goes along with the scene in which Olivia and Nina meet for the first time since her "accident," as Nina suspiciously calls it with a slight hesitation. I was expecting Olivia to say something to the effect of, "What happened to me? You know! You were supposed to be at that restaurant, and you weren't there!" but she didn't, which leads me to believe that she doesn't even remember Nina making the appointment with her, but again, as I said, I could have sworn that she said that she remembers up to when the car "almost" hit her (even though it really did in "our" universe), but maybe that's what I'm getting wrong. Maybe I should watch the scene in the premiere episode during which she first wakes up again, just to make sure. It seems to me like Olivia would remember Nina setting up that meeting and would therefore be suspicious of her.

What really bothers me about Nina in this episode is that she obviously knows who Olivia went to see. She's the one who fulfilled her promise to arrange the meeting, so why isn't she telling her this? Why is she keeping her in the dark, arranging for her to see this Sam Weiss guy when she could just fill her in herself, and who exactly is not a psychologist," which makes me wonder who exactly he is, what he did for Nina ("put me back together" is what Nina says, potentially loosely paraphrased) and what he plans to do for Olivia. What does Nina's cancer have to do with Olivia's "condition," and most importantly, what is Olivia's "condition," and what does Weiss mean when he tells her that she will eventually be experiencing headaches? I wish I had theories for all of these questions to help make this entry a bit more interesting, but I really don't; nothing comes to mind, and this is one of the reasons why Fringe is so amazing; it consistently keeps you guessing.

Walter is behaving a bit suspiciously too. Well, he's behaving a bit more suspiciously than usual, shall we say? He knows something about Olivia, as well, something that he's not telling her. When he tells her that sometimes moving from one reality to another has its consequences, she instantly shows concern, and Walter moves on to another subject, almost as if he feels that he has already said too much, telling her that he is sure that she will be fine, but the look on his face is unmistakable; he is drastically worried, and I would imagine that his worry has something to do with Olivia's strange new "ability" to hear things with extreme precision and volume. I am wondering whether or not he knows that she is experiencing this. That scene near the end in which Olivia is taking a bath, and she hears arguing, traffic outside, a fly in the room and the bubbles in the tub popping, I was starting to become vehemently annoyed and was wondering how she isn't screaming to make it stop; that has to get under your skin.

I don't know if anyone else noticed this either, but even though we see Olivia trying to find answers, she seems a lot more cheery than usual in this episode. She smiles a lot more often, seems a lot more friendlier and warmer with Walter, cracks jokes (such as the "What's your name?" line when the doctor asks her how her short term memory is), etc. She just seems a lot happier, and I'm not sure what to make of it, but I do have one theory. I think that the "real" Olivia is the Olivia that we see at the beginning of the pilot episode when she is all smiles and laughs with John Scott, and then after he "betrays" her and dies, she is crushed, and we see the effects of that trauma for quite some time. I think that she is slowly coming out of that shell and learning that in Peter and Walter, she has friends that will help her pull through when she needs them, especially Peter. I am just so worried, though, because she is going to be torn apart when she finds out about Charlie. He is her partner and ultimately her best friend, and she won't even have a body to mourn.

Next week's episode is called "Fracture," but I can't really say too much about it, because to be completely honest, I don't really know that much about it. The week after "Fracture," however, we will be seeing an episode titled "Momentum Deferred," which was either originally titled "This Is the Night Mail" or "This Is the Night Mail" is the name of the fifth episode, since the first eight episodes have been given titles except for that one, which is strange. All I have to say about "Momentum Deferred" is that I am really looking forward to that episode; it looks like it's going to be mythology-heavy with possibly some real, concrete answers. It really does look like it's going to be epic. It won't be a seemingly unnecessary (but admittedly entertaining) "stand-alone" like this one, to which I give 6 naked mole-babies.

Fringe - "A New Day in the Old Town" (2.01) - Season Premiere


Fringe opens its new season with an amazing premiere, and I honestly think that it is better than the finale last spring, and that's saying a lot because the finale really left a mark on me, despite my utter disappointment that Jones was killed off so dismissively (he had better be back; there is still an alter-Jones, after all). As much as I may love this episode, though, and as epic as it may be, there are definitely problems that I have with it, as well. For starters, when I read a vague synopsis a while back, I was immediately fearful that this would not be very original, but I will discuss more at a later point in regards to that. Like I said, though, for the most part, this really impressed me. I was expecting an excellent season premiere because it's Fringe, but this is even better than I was expecting. Anyway, before I begin discussing the episode, I do warn you that this entry does contain spoilers, so if you haven't seen this yet but would like to see it, then please, do not read any further.

What I mainly like about this episode is the development that we get out of Olivia's character. Anna Torv's acting in this episode is beyond superb; in my opinion, she is right up there with John Noble in this episode. She really impressed me. There are a lot of emotional scenes between her and Peter, and there is a lot of hinting that there will most likely eventually be a bit more than a friendship between them, at least from my perspective, anyway. For example, when Peter and Rachel are talking in the hallway of the hospital when they're under the impression that they're losing Olivia, Rachel tells Peter that "she always liked you," and my interpretation of that was that she meant as more than just a friend. These scenes would definitely not be as emotional, though, without Anna's stunning acting ability. Needless to say, I think that if there were ever anyone saying that Olivia's bland, one-dimensional character throughout the first season is due to Anna Torv's acting, I think that Anna definitely disproved them. She even had the best line of the episode ("Go get that bitch!"), in my opinion, even in comparison to Walter's "I want to see the look on her face when she eats my pudding," and I don't think that that is ever the case in the first season.

There are two scenes that really surprised me in this episode. Firstly, there is the kiss between Nina and Broyles, and I was not expecting that, not even in the slightest. I never, in a million years, would have seen that coming, and I don't think that anyone could have. I don't really know what to think of it, but Nina does say something rather mysterious. After she kisses him, she says, "Do what you always used to do, Phillip; save the day." This was obviously mysterious, because what is she talking about? In what way did he "save the day" for her? I am really hoping that that is explored further later in the season. You see, my theory regarding Nina is that she had a prior relationship with Walter and that she is Peter's mother, and if I turn out to be right about that and she also has had a prior relationship with Broyles, then I suppose that that really complicates things, especially since we don't know if anything happened between her and Bell, either.

The other scene that really surprised me is obviously the ending. Then again, I really shouldn't say obviously, because when I talked about this with some fellow Fringe fans in The Fringe Podcast chat last night, some people said that they found it to be relatively predictable, which surprised me, because it shocked me. Obviously, what I'm talking about is the scene in which it is revealed that the shapeshifting soldier has killed Charlie and is now impersonating him, consequently throwing his body into a furnace. This scene is extremely dark and even disturbing in a way, because I still can't believe Charlie is dead. What is it with J.J.'s shows being condemned to their Charlies dying? Then again, I don't think that Alias's Charlie died. Anyway, Charlie was Olivia's best friend; she trusted him and told him everything, and I am not looking forward to the scene in which she finds out about this. It's really going to break her, which is definitely not what she needs right now.
 
As I said previously, I do have some complaints about the episode, as amazing as I thought it was. For starters, I feel that on some levels, it really did lack a bit of originality, which is something that I feared when I first found out that it would involve a man who could shapeshift. To me, the whole idea of a shapeshifting soldier seems to be a combination of the two primary conflicts in The X-Files, but I'm not sure what to think, because first of all, according to what someone said in The Fringe Podcast chat last night, this is commonly used in science fiction, the concept of the "bad guy" being able to mold his body into any appearance he chooses, and plus, the concept is a bit different from X. With The X-Files, the shapeshifters are alien bounty hunters, and they can willingly become anyone they want to at any time they want to. Apparently, the guy in Fringe needs a victim, so he is more like a "body snatcher," if you will. Still, the similarity kind of bothers me. Then again, it could have been intentional. Jeff Pinkner said shortly before the episode premiered that there would be an X homage, possibly two, in the premiere episode and that it would be "obvious." Obviously, there is the scene near the beginning of the episode in which we see Mulder and Scully on the television, but perhaps, he was talking about this, too.

Something else that disappointed me about this episode is that I was under the impression that Bell was going to be in it. I recently saw a promo in which Olivia asks him for answers, and he says something to the effect of, "It's too late for that, my child." I had a theory very early on in the show that Bell is her biological father or possibly even the stepfather that she shot twice, but I don't think it's the latter, because it seems to me that when she sees him in the season one finale, she would recognize him, even considering that it has been quite a few years. There is definitely, however, some sort of relationship between the two of them, even if it's not biological. Don't forget what he says to her when she visits him in the finale. He says something like, "I have been waiting a very long time for this." Anyway, I really like Bell, even though we only see him for a few seconds in the finale. I'm assuming that what I saw in the clip will be in an episode in the very near future, but I thought that the deal was that Bell was going to be in the finale and the first few episodes of the second season (hopefully more, eventually).

Lastly, I'm not so sure how I feel about this Amy Jessup character. As David Wu (the Fringemunks) said, it seems like her role in the show could be filled by Astrid's character, and I agree with him. Astrid desperately needs some character development, so why push her to the side and bring in a new female character? It just doesn't make any sense to me. My guess is that she was brought in to replace Charlie when the mole is compromised, and this is actually hinted at near the beginning of the episode when Peter is expecting to talk to Charlie and instead gets her, as if she has replaced him. I just feel as if her purpose on the show needs to be made clear quickly, or else I'm honestly not going to feel anything for her anytime soon. One question I still have in my mind even after watching the episode twice is what is going on in the scene at the end where she is seemingly leafing through Fringe Division files on the computer while consulting the Bible; that didn't make any sense to me, and I feel as if I must have missed something. Maybe it's something that wasn't supposed to make any sense?

It is quite obvious to me that Walter is feeling guilty about something. He knows something, quite possibly a lot of somethings, that he's hiding. One way in which I know this is that at the beginning of the episode, it seems as if he knows how to bring Olivia back. He fools with the car a little bit and then voila, Olivia comes flying out of the front window, and while he is fooling with the car, he awkwardly says, "Oh, my" to himself. Additionally, he sees her while she is in the hospital and apologizes to her for something. Plus, we already know that he most likely had something to do with Peter's death at a young age and then either cloned him or brought alter-Peter over to his reality, and he's expressing guilt about that. There is the scene at the beginning when he tells Peter that he is going to make him custard, and when Peter says something like, "I don't like custard; I have never liked custard," Walter responds by saying that he did when he was a young boy but that he had forgotten, and the look on his face after saying that is quite obviously an expression of guilty knowledge. Finally, there is the scene in which Walter is about to present the video of the blonde woman talking about the soldiers who "can look like any one of us," when beforehand, Peter says that Walter has been looking at pictures of Peter as a young boy a lot lately and that he has also been frequently making sure that he's not dead when he's asleep, which is "creepy," and Walter then immediately changes the subject.

All right, so I do have some hopes and expectations for this season, and firstly, I want more Jones. I still can't believe that they killed him off in the season one finale, so I am really hoping that we get to at least see alter-Jones this season. I'm sorry, but Jones is a very cool bad guy, and I'm hoping that we haven't seen the end of him. There is also someone in The Fringe Podcast chat who speculated that these super-soldiers are ZFT, but I really doubt this, and this is why; unless this one particular soldier is rogue (which I doubt, because as Peter and Jessup discuss, soldiers have a mission that they need to carry out, which gives me the impression of a collective motivation), their goals don't add up. If you recall, in episode 1.14, "Ability," Jones tells Olivia that she is very important, and he actually seems somewhat protective of her, which leads me to believe that ZFT's goal is not to kill Olivia but instead to possibly recruit her, unless, of course, Jones is the one who is rogue, which is a lot more plausible.

Secondly, as stated previously, I would really like for Peter's past to be explored further, because I would really like to know exactly what happened to him. He obviously died, and even though I'm sure it was at Walter's hands, we don't know what happened yet. My guess is that he was experimenting on him, since it is heavily hinted at throughout the first season, and the experiment went very terribly wrong. However, something else tells me that it seems as if the writers would be more likely to come up with something more elaborate and more shocking than that, because at this point, I don't think that I'm really discussing anything profound here because I'm pretty sure that this is what just about everyone is thinking. For now, however, I think I have covered just about everything that I wanted to cover. As I said, this episode blows me away, and it gets a well-deserved score of 10 flying olives. Be sure to watch the second episode of the new season next Thursday at the same time, "Night of Desirable Objects."

"The Visitor" (Fringe #6)

Before discussion of this comic begins, I would like to advise those who have not read the Fringe comics but would like to read them that they shouldn't read any further, as this does contain spoilers. This comic takes us closer to the current Fringe time period and, in fact, leads us directly into it, ending with Olivia introducing herself to Walter at St. Claire's. Since the conclusion of the last Walter and Bell story, the two of them have parted ways, Carla Warren has died in the lab fire, and Walter is residing at St. Claire's. This is my favorite comic out of the first comic book series, because we really do learn quite a lot about Walter and his past at St. Claire's, and unlike the other five comics, this comic consists only of this story and does not include a "stand-alone" story. I think that this comic offers insight into "Grey Matters" (2.10) (or the other way around, for that matter, since the comic came first), since someone is trying very hard to get Walter to explain what happened the night that Peter was taken from the Other Side, which, of course, we previously understood as the night that September saved Walter and Peter from the ice water after the two of them ran off the road, only half of which is true, as we now know thanks to "Peter" (2.15).
 
In this comic, Walter is seeing himself at St. Claire's, which is one of two references to "The Equation" (1.08). The question, which is a question that has been asked before, is, is he seeing Walternate, or is his guilty conscience manifesting itself? If it is Walternate, why would he want Walter to resist? Why would he want Walter to fight the procedure being conducted by the unidentified visitor pretending to be an FBI agent? If the visitor is from the Other Side, then it would be logical to assume that Walternate would want Walter to tell the visitor everything that he knows. It would, in fact, be logical to assume that Walternate is the one who sent him here. It could be, however, that the visitor is from this side and that he is trying to find out what Walter did to ensure that it doesn't happen again, or, on the contrary, so that he can do it, in which case it would make perfect sense that Walternate would not want Walter to crack. In this case, it would also be logical to assume that the visitor is ZFT. The other reference to "The Equation" (1.08), of course, is the appearance of Dashiell Kim, who tells Walter that he is still trying to solve his [Dashiell's] equation. 
 
Walter says that he is sixty years old, which means that this comic (most of it, anyway) takes place in 2006, three years before Walter returns to St. Claire's to see Kim about the equation. What is really interesting about the way that the scene in which Walter recalls what happened the night that Peter was taken is that what Walter tells the visitor and what we see happen are not one and the same. Walter tells him that he was able to save himself and Peter, but what we see is September saving them. Therefore, when Walter receives an electrical charge, we assume that he is simply lying about that, but we now know that he was not, that a car didn't go off the road. Walter stole Peter from the Other Side and fell through the ice on foot, because the water sucked up the energy that was required to take Peter. The visitor decides to use a much more invasive, painful procedure, and right before Walter is rescued from being tortured, he sings his usual "lion's den" song, which we typically see him sing when he is under a great amount of duress and is afraid. He is rescued, however, by someone that realizes that the visitor is not an FBI agent, that he is alternate motives (possibly rooted in an alternate reality), but the visitor is able to escape somehow, inexplicably using sunblock lotion in the process. Chances are good that he either somehow returned to the Other Side or he teleported elsewhere, although I haven't a clue what sunblock lotion has to do with either.
 
What I really love about this comic is that it is very heavily rooted in mythology and asks a great deal of questions. Who is the man who visited Walter at St. Claire's, and where does his allegiance lie? Is he from the Other Side, and if not, what does he want, exactly? What does he hope to achieve by knowing what happened that night? Is he ZFT? Do his actions have anything to do with Bell having visited Walter posing as Dr. Simon Paris? Perhaps, this man was working for Bell? What about Walter seeing himself? Is he seeing Walternate, or is he hallucinating due to his guilt? In "The Equation" (1.08), he sees himself (on the other side of the institution, mind you) after reminding Kim that a young boy's life is at stake. Will this ever be explained in the TV series, or are fans simply supposed to be split between the two theories? Lastly, what about the sunblock lotion? Does what the visitor does have anything to do with what Jones does in the first season? Does he teleport, and if so, what does sunblock lotion have to do with it? If he instead returns to the Other Side, how does he do this, and again, what does sunblock lotion have to do with it? There have already been questions asked in the comics that have been touched upon in the TV series (such as, for example, Walter's father having been a Nazi spy), so hopefully, other ones will be, as well. As previously stated, this is the best comic out of the first six, and I give it ten electrical charges.